.

One of Two City Fire Stations Closing This Summer

Budget cuts hit police and fire, but swim center and cable TV station spared.

The city council voted unanimously Wednesday night to close the fire station in the Pinole Valley,  to leave a vacant police officer position frozen and to eliminate subsidies for recreation programs. The vote retained money to operate the swim center for the summer and for its cable TV station.

The actions are the first in in a series of steps to save about $1.5 million in general fund spending. The fire station will close July 1 and the police officer job could be reconsidered later this year. Closure of the fire station will save about $1.5 million per year, but a firefighter will be added to each of three daily shifts at the downtown fire station at a cost of $500,000 per year. It is possible that the Valley station could be reopened if economic conditions improve in future years.

Council member Debbie Long tried to tie the "brownout" of the valley fire station to a provision that city employees agree to a a 15 percent cut in compensation among all city departments, but she had no support. Council member Pete Murray said that level of reduction couldn't be assumed because of service mandates that certain departments are legally obligated to provide. City Manager Belinda Espinosa agreed, saying that Long's approach was not feasible, in part because salary and benefit concessions must be negotiated and couldn't be arrived at arbitrarily.

Although the swim center and cable TV operations avoided immediate cuts, the council voted to eliminate subsidies to both for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. The swim center could remain open if it could form a nonprofit group and raise its own funds. The TV station also will lose its $48,000 subsidy by 2012.

"We can't wish our way out of this," Murray said. "It's something very difficult to deal with but we have to do it. We've all got to understand it's a sacrifice and there's no way out."

Outstanding uncertainties blur the budget picture for the next two fiscal years. One is how negotiations with city labor unions will progress and the other is the state's pending decision to erase city redevelopment agencies. New labor contracts appear likely to include salary reductions, and Espinosa said layoffs will come before the end of the current fiscal year, which ends June 30.

The next budget challenge for the city will be figuring out how to replace about $2 million in funds now collected through its redevelopment agency. Pending state legislation would eliminate such agencies all over California. Virtually all redevelopment funds will be redistributed to schools, Medicare and courts this year as a one-time infusion. Pinole would recoup about $740,000 of redevelopment money beginning fiscal year 2012-13. That might allow the city to restore cuts made Wednesday. The state will give the city $250,000 a year to close down redevelopment operations.

With the loss of redevelopment money, Espinosa told the council she would start from "ground zero" to build new budgets. The approach will fund police and fire departments at a level to be determined. Then city staff will prioritize other staff requirements down to clerical help until available general funds are exhausted.

"I already know there will be layoffs before July 1," she said, estimating that it will take about 30 days to bring back a new budget strategy. "But I want a chance to restructure the plan and see how I can try to make it work. I'm going to find the $4 million, one way or the other, whether it's a combination of layoffs or making some positions part time, eliminating positions and recreating something that we really need to have. If we were done with (labor)  negotiations right now I could plug that number in. But we're not."

Some council members acknowledged that a conversation with the community is needed to determine the level of services that it desires, balanced by how much people are willing to pay in taxes and fees.

"I see the need to make changes," Long said. "I see the need to take this out to the public if they don't like the changes, how we can restore. It's going to take pubic support, and maybe that's what the state's looking at is for us to be sustainable without them helping us out."

Murray noted that after next fiscal year a utility user tax, which generates about $2 million per year, is due to expire. That would be another hit to the city budget unless voters approve to extend the life of the tax. In November, 2010 voters rejected a ballot measure to extend the tax.

Bill Stanaro March 18, 2011 at 01:04 AM
WITH THE COMING OF JULY 4TH AND THE ILLEGAL FIREWORKS THAT WILL BE GOING OFF...CLOSING THE VALLEY FIRE STATION IS A REAL HAZARD. WE HAVE PEOPLE FIRING OFF ROCKETS AND FLARES AND FIRE CRACKERS ALONG WITH M80s EVERY 4TH. ON NEW YEARS EVE..WE HAD ROCKETS BEING FIRED INTO DRY GRASS. IT WILL BE WORSE COME THE 4TH OF JULY. NOW THEY SHUT THE FIRE STATION. MAYBE THE CITY COUNCIL CAN COME OUT HERE IN THE VALLEY AND PUT THE FIRES OUT.
Kim March 18, 2011 at 05:08 AM
Not to mention if you live out in the Valley and have a heart attack or child with a medical emergency. It is a long way from downtown to the end of Wright Ave.
Kathryn March 18, 2011 at 03:57 PM
These are the consequences of eliminating the utility users tax. The measure was overwhelmingly defeated last November. It wasn't an increase, just an extension of an existing tax. Where do you think the money to pay for services come from? I would prepare for further cuts.
SalthePlumber March 18, 2011 at 06:47 PM
FYI. The defeated Utility Users Tax measure in the last election was an ADDITION, because water was going to be taxed for the first time (Air will be taxed at a later date). It was also a ten year EXTENSION of the current UUT. It was an overreach and failed...
Kathryn March 18, 2011 at 07:26 PM
It was an extension of the current utility tax for eight years, and include the water utility as taxable. That's the past, no sense rehashing it now. We need to pay for the services we want. That money doesn't just happen. If you have a creative idea how to generate funds to support the valley fire station, it'd be greatly appreciated if you could share.
SalthePlumber March 19, 2011 at 02:52 AM
Kathryn, you are correct, we need to pay for the services we want. It's a tough time and many Pinole citizens are experiencing tough economics at home. Adding to the tax burden will be a hard sell and I think it has to do with the people and practices of our City government... If you put money in a vending machine and nothing came out, would you get more money and try again? Any new revenues generated by the City has to be dedicated, in no uncertain terms, to the specific need, like Station 74

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something